Comparison

InBody 970 vs Tanita BC-545

InBody 970 and Tanita BC-545: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

InBody 970: when to consider it

InBody 970/970S is a professional series for segmental body-composition analysis, including body water and phase angle. The variants differ in frequencies and testing time; location details identify the exact model.

Tanita BC-545: when to consider it

BC-545 InnerScan is a body-composition scale with personal-profile memory. Its manual describes fat and muscle-mass results and graphs for tracking change. This is the original BC-545; specifications from later BC-545N or BC-545F models are not transferred.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsInBody 970Tanita BC-545
Recording time≈ 70 sNot verified
Body weight range5–300 kgNot verified
Height range95–220 cmNot verified
Device weight46 kgNot verified
Measurement frequencies1, 5, 50, 250, 500 kHz; 1, 2, 3 MHzNot verified
Contact electrodes8Not verified
Measurement positionStandingNot verified
Method and electrodesDSM-BIA / SMF-BIA; 8 tactile electrodesNot verified
Measured segmentsRight and left arm, trunk, right and left legNot verified
MethodNot verifiedBioelectrical impedance (BIA)
Documented outputsNot verifiedBody fat, muscle mass; daily, weekly and monthly graphs
Result displayNot verifiedDisplay and memory for 4 people
Designation scopeNot verifiedBC-545 / InnerScan
Dimensions (width × depth × height)614.1 × 963.8 × 1,239.9 mmEvidenceNot verified
Age in the cited catalogue3–99 yearsEvidenceNot verified
Impedance measurements40EvidenceNot verified
Device internal database capacity100,000 recordsModel sourcesNot verified
Display10.1″ colour TFT LCD; 1,280 × 800Model sourcesNot verified
Display diagonal10.1″Model sourcesNot verified
Documented interfaces4× RS-232C, 2× USB host, USB device, Ethernet, Wi-Fi, BluetoothModel sourcesNot verified

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification