Comparison

ACCUNIQ BC300 vs Bodystat QuadScan 4000

ACCUNIQ BC300 and Bodystat QuadScan 4000: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

ACCUNIQ BC300: when to consider it

ACCUNIQ BC300 uses multi-frequency BIA with eight contact electrodes. Results include estimated whole-body and regional fat and muscle for the arms, legs and trunk. Its foldable design supports transport.

Bodystat QuadScan 4000: when to consider it

QuadScan 4000 measures impedance at four frequencies using adhesive electrodes. Alongside estimated fat and fat-free mass, it reports body-water compartments, resistance, reactance and phase angle. Testing is supine; the operator enters height and weight.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsACCUNIQ BC300Bodystat QuadScan 4000
MethodMulti-frequency BIAMulti-frequency BIA
Measurement frequencies5, 50, 250 kHz5, 50, 100, 200 kHz
Electrodes8 contact electrodes4 adhesive electrodes
Maximum weight200 kgNot verified
Measured regionsBoth arms, both legs and trunkNot verified
Measurement positionNot verifiedSupine
Documented outputsNot verifiedEstimated fat, fat-free mass, total, intracellular and extracellular water; 50 kHz phase angle

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification