Comparison

ACCUNIQ BC300 vs Nutriguard-MS

ACCUNIQ BC300 and Nutriguard-MS: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

ACCUNIQ BC300: when to consider it

ACCUNIQ BC300 uses multi-frequency BIA with eight contact electrodes. Results include estimated whole-body and regional fat and muscle for the arms, legs and trunk. Its foldable design supports transport.

Nutriguard-MS: when to consider it

Nutriguard-MS measures bioelectrical impedance at 5, 50 and 100 kHz. Standard testing uses four adhesive electrodes on the hand and foot of one side. Body-composition and water estimates are evaluated from resistance and reactance using the relevant software; regional mode requires the appropriate procedure.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsACCUNIQ BC300Nutriguard-MS
MethodMulti-frequency BIAMulti-frequency BIA
Measurement frequencies5, 50, 250 kHz5, 50, 100 kHz
Electrodes8 contact electrodes4 adhesive electrodes for whole-body testing
Maximum weight200 kgNot verified
Measured regionsBoth arms, both legs and trunkNot verified
Documented outputsNot verifiedResistance and reactance; body-composition interpretation through software

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification