Comparison

ACCUNIQ BC300 vs Tanita BC-1000

ACCUNIQ BC300 and Tanita BC-1000: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

ACCUNIQ BC300: when to consider it

ACCUNIQ BC300 uses multi-frequency BIA with eight contact electrodes. Results include estimated whole-body and regional fat and muscle for the arms, legs and trunk. Its foldable design supports transport.

Tanita BC-1000: when to consider it

BC-1000 is a body-composition scale that transmits results wirelessly to a compatible receiver. Its manual lists fat, muscle and body water; capacity is 200 kg. BC-1000 Plus is a different version; accessories may vary in a package labelled “PROFI”.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsACCUNIQ BC300Tanita BC-1000
MethodMulti-frequency BIABioelectrical impedance (BIA)
Measurement frequencies5, 50, 250 kHzNot verified
Electrodes8 contact electrodesNot verified
Maximum weight200 kg200 kg
Measured regionsBoth arms, both legs and trunkNot verified
Documented outputsNot verifiedBody fat, muscle mass and body water
Result displayNot verifiedCompatible wireless receiver / external display

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification