Comparison

ACCUNIQ BC720 vs OMRON BF511

ACCUNIQ BC720 and OMRON BF511: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

ACCUNIQ BC720: when to consider it

ACCUNIQ BC720 uses multi-frequency BIA with eight contact electrodes. Results include estimated whole-body and regional fat and muscle for the arms, legs and trunk. BC720 also reports extracellular water and phase angle.

OMRON BF511: when to consider it

BF511 is a scale with eight sensors contacting hands and feet. It uses 50 kHz BIA to estimate body-fat percentage, skeletal-muscle percentage and visceral-fat level alongside weight and BMI. It provides a whole-body overview; separate limb results are not documented.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsACCUNIQ BC720OMRON BF511
MethodMulti-frequency BIABioelectrical impedance (BIA)
Measurement frequencies1, 5, 50, 250, 550, 1000 kHz50 kHz
Electrodes8 contact electrodes8 hand-and-foot sensors
Maximum weight270 kg150 kg
Measured regionsBoth arms, both legs and trunkNot verified
Documented outputsNot verifiedWeight, BMI, fat and skeletal-muscle percentage, visceral-fat level

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification