Comparison

ACCUNIQ BC720 vs Tanita RD-545HR

ACCUNIQ BC720 and Tanita RD-545HR: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

ACCUNIQ BC720: when to consider it

ACCUNIQ BC720 uses multi-frequency BIA with eight contact electrodes. Results include estimated whole-body and regional fat and muscle for the arms, legs and trunk. BC720 also reports extracellular water and phase angle.

Tanita RD-545HR: when to consider it

RD-545HR uses dual-frequency segmental BIA with a handle and app connection. It provides fat, muscle and regional results as well as heart rate. HR distinguishes it from the original RD-545; a scale’s bone-mass estimate is distinct from bone densitometry.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsACCUNIQ BC720Tanita RD-545HR
MethodMulti-frequency BIADual-frequency BIA
Measurement frequencies1, 5, 50, 250, 550, 1000 kHzNot verified
Electrodes8 contact electrodesNot verified
Maximum weight270 kg200 kg
Measured regionsBoth arms, both legs and trunkBoth arms, both legs and trunk
Documented outputsNot verifiedFat, muscle mass, water, regional results and heart rate

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification