Comparison

Bodystat QuadScan 4000 vs OMRON BF300

Bodystat QuadScan 4000 and OMRON BF300: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

Bodystat QuadScan 4000: when to consider it

QuadScan 4000 measures impedance at four frequencies using adhesive electrodes. Alongside estimated fat and fat-free mass, it reports body-water compartments, resistance, reactance and phase angle. Testing is supine; the operator enters height and weight.

OMRON BF300: when to consider it

BF300 is a handheld body-fat monitor using arm-to-arm BIA. A primary study describes a single 50 kHz frequency, four electrodes and standing measurement with arms extended. Its principal output is estimated body-fat percentage; it is distinct from the BF511 scale.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsBodystat QuadScan 4000OMRON BF300
MethodMulti-frequency BIABioelectrical impedance (BIA)
Measurement frequencies5, 50, 100, 200 kHz50 kHz
Measurement positionSupineStanding
Electrodes4 adhesive electrodes4 contact electrodes for both hands
Documented outputsEstimated fat, fat-free mass, total, intracellular and extracellular water; 50 kHz phase angleEstimated body-fat percentage

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification