Comparison

InBody 520 vs Tanita MC-780

InBody 520 and Tanita MC-780: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

InBody 520: when to consider it

An older model for following fat, muscle and water during nutrition or exercise changes, and for understanding past results. Includes ECW/TBW and lean-mass distribution across the arms, legs and trunk.

Tanita MC-780: when to consider it

The MC-780 family uses multi-frequency segmental BIA to report fat, muscle mass and body water, including regional results. A base designation does not identify the P/S configuration or MA/MA-N generation.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsInBody 520Tanita MC-780
Recording time50 sNot verified
Body weight range10–250 kgNot verified
Height range95–220 cmNot verified
Device weight26 kgNot verified
Measurement frequencies5, 50, 500 kHzNot verified
Contact electrodes8Not verified
Measurement positionStandingNot verified
Operating temperature10–40 °CNot verified
MethodNot verifiedMulti-frequency BIA
Measured regionsNot verifiedBoth arms, both legs and trunk
Documented outputsNot verifiedFat, muscle mass, body water; regional results
Designation scopeNot verifiedFamily; variant unspecified
Dimensions (width × depth × height)522 × 843 × 1,015 mmEvidenceNot verified
Age in the cited catalogue3–99 yearsEvidenceNot verified
Impedance measurements15EvidenceNot verified
DisplayColour LCD, 640 × 480 pixelsEvidenceNot verified
Documented interfacesRS-232C, USB Host, USB Slave and EthernetEvidenceNot verified
Measured regionsRight and left arm, trunk, right and left legModel sourcesNot verified
WeighingBuilt-in weighing platform; height is enteredModel sourcesNot verified
ResultsPrinted report and export through manufacturer softwareModel sourcesNot verified

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification