Comparison

ACCUNIQ BC720 vs OMRON BF300

ACCUNIQ BC720 and OMRON BF300: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

ACCUNIQ BC720: when to consider it

ACCUNIQ BC720 uses multi-frequency BIA with eight contact electrodes. Results include estimated whole-body and regional fat and muscle for the arms, legs and trunk. BC720 also reports extracellular water and phase angle.

OMRON BF300: when to consider it

BF300 is a handheld body-fat monitor using arm-to-arm BIA. A primary study describes a single 50 kHz frequency, four electrodes and standing measurement with arms extended. Its principal output is estimated body-fat percentage; it is distinct from the BF511 scale.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsACCUNIQ BC720OMRON BF300
MethodMulti-frequency BIABioelectrical impedance (BIA)
Measurement frequencies1, 5, 50, 250, 550, 1000 kHz50 kHz
Electrodes8 contact electrodes4 contact electrodes for both hands
Maximum weight270 kgNot verified
Measured regionsBoth arms, both legs and trunkNot verified
Measurement positionNot verifiedStanding
Documented outputsNot verifiedEstimated body-fat percentage

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification